<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Are These 24 Costs What Manchester Pays For The Congestion Charge?</title> <atom:link href="http://manchester-blog.com/are-these-24-costs-what-manchester-pays-for-the-congestion-charge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://manchester-blog.com/are-these-24-costs-what-manchester-pays-for-the-congestion-charge/</link> <description>Manchester car parking on the M60 can you explain it?</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Congestion charge &#124; Squaremonitor.com</title><link>http://manchester-blog.com/are-these-24-costs-what-manchester-pays-for-the-congestion-charge/comment-page-1/#comment-8596</link> <dc:creator>Congestion charge &#124; Squaremonitor.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:54:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://manchester-blog.com/are-these-24-costs-what-manchester-pays-for-the-congestion-charge/#comment-8596</guid> <description>[...] are also some other reasons I didnt think about which have been bought up in The Manchester Blog. If the congestion charge happens, the council will have to properly install number plate [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are also some other reasons I didnt think about which have been bought up in The Manchester Blog. If the congestion charge happens, the council will have to properly install number plate [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Congestion Charging in Manchester: It&#8217;s just a bad idea &#171; UMCF</title><link>http://manchester-blog.com/are-these-24-costs-what-manchester-pays-for-the-congestion-charge/comment-page-1/#comment-8395</link> <dc:creator>Congestion Charging in Manchester: It&#8217;s just a bad idea &#171; UMCF</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:31:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://manchester-blog.com/are-these-24-costs-what-manchester-pays-for-the-congestion-charge/#comment-8395</guid> <description>[...] contain a huge carrot in the form of £3bn worth of &#8216;investment&#8217; into public transport (and probably a few hundred million into implementing the charging scheme itself). Hidden away , however, is the fact that £1.2bn of this money comes in the form of a loan which is [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] contain a huge carrot in the form of £3bn worth of &#8216;investment&#8217; into public transport (and probably a few hundred million into implementing the charging scheme itself). Hidden away , however, is the fact that £1.2bn of this money comes in the form of a loan which is [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
