<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Manchester In The Pink on Monopoly!</title> <atom:link href="http://manchester-blog.com/manchester-in-the-pink-on-monopoly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://manchester-blog.com/manchester-in-the-pink-on-monopoly/</link> <description>Manchester car parking on the M60 can you explain it?</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: John Nash</title><link>http://manchester-blog.com/manchester-in-the-pink-on-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-29685</link> <dc:creator>John Nash</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 14:09:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://manchester-blog.com/manchester-in-the-pink-on-monopoly/#comment-29685</guid> <description>Got me thinking, is there a foursquare version of monopoly?
The monopoly tour is pretty popular in London so how about putting a specific Manchester game on-line and use something like Foursquare to track users.  Most check-ins gives you the option to buy a house, charge rent etc?
If I was a technical genius it would be my next job!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got me thinking, is there a foursquare version of monopoly?</p><p>The monopoly tour is pretty popular in London so how about putting a specific Manchester game on-line and use something like Foursquare to track users.  Most check-ins gives you the option to buy a house, charge rent etc?</p><p>If I was a technical genius it would be my next job!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim Symcox</title><link>http://manchester-blog.com/manchester-in-the-pink-on-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link> <dc:creator>Jim Symcox</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 16:35:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://manchester-blog.com/manchester-in-the-pink-on-monopoly/#comment-100</guid> <description>Hi Chris, thanks for that thought. Mind you if they&#039;d allocated the squares as they should - by value for t&#039;money - us up North would win and get Park Lane and Mayfair wouldn&#039;t we?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris, thanks for that thought. Mind you if they&#8217;d allocated the squares as they should &#8211; by value for t&#8217;money &#8211; us up North would win and get Park Lane and Mayfair wouldn&#8217;t we?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Boswell</title><link>http://manchester-blog.com/manchester-in-the-pink-on-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link> <dc:creator>Chris Boswell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:08:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://manchester-blog.com/manchester-in-the-pink-on-monopoly/#comment-98</guid> <description>I knew that Liverpool had been allocated Old Kent Road status, but Leeds being down the bottom end is news - bugger. Maybe they should have just done it on property prices rather than votes, but then I suppose Leeds would still be low down. Oh well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew that Liverpool had been allocated Old Kent Road status, but Leeds being down the bottom end is news &#8211; bugger. Maybe they should have just done it on property prices rather than votes, but then I suppose Leeds would still be low down. Oh well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
